Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 14 avr. 05, à 08:24, Daniel Fagerstrom a écrit :
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
....Before voting, what worries me slightly is the "supposed to work" bit...
I didn't look into the new stuff yet, are there tests (automated or not) to help make a more precise assessment?
Of course :)
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon/blocks/unsupported/template/ trunk/test/org/apache/cocoon/
I wouldn't dare trying to refactor such a complicated beast as JXTG whithout automated testing...
Thanks for the clarification - I should have looked before asking, this is much more reassuring than "supposed to work" ;-)
I should probably have choosen a somewhat more optimistic formulation. But I have worked to long time with program development for being able to feel comfortable in making any definite statements about program correctness ;) My programming style nowdays is rather paranoid.
/Daniel
