On 9/22/05, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniele Madama wrote: > Idea is simple, but works. I like the fact that it respects the > dependency information. That will ease people's lives a lot. My Ant > based installer didn't do that. > > Here's a few thoughts: > > 1. Could you show the dependency information in the right hand pane? It > isn't always clear as to why a block's tick is grayed out. > 2. Could you add a page/tab for the basic options in build.properties? > 3. Could you add a pane that actually invokes Ant? If you could do > that, and added a 'welcome' pane, you'd have written a full > installer, which would be excellent. All it would need to do is set > stdout to an output stream that gets written to a list box or text > box, and has a cancel button. > 4. Could you make it use a more modern UI style?
I'll add #5 then: adding a Jetty control pane to start/stop the webapp. -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)
