sorry for duplicating Ross' effort. I only know understand what he meant by "removing the documentation name is not the solution".

I now also realise what happened and what the rationale was behind the way it is currently set up in Daisy:

the main menu bar suggests that there are sub sections: About, Documentation, Community etc. I wanted to keep that division so I created the "folders" About, Documentation, Community etc. I focused more on the appearance of the menu on the left than on the urls. When there was a discrepancy, I choose the menu above the url.

So, I can either remove the "headers" like About and Documentation and they have to be added in the daisy-to-forrest conversion, or we have to settle for a slightly adjusted url space.

When removing the xdocs from the repository I left the original book.xml and other relative files in for reference of these headers.

So from my POV there is an inconsistency between what the menu suggest and the urls reflect in the ORIGINAL site. I have tried to fix that in the Daisy documentation.

I never realised that people pay more attention to urls than to the menu. Sorry for that and sorry for not communicating all these ideas and decisions.

Bye, Helma

Reply via email to