Hi all,

The W3C recently set up an "XML Processing working group"[1] whose primary goal is to define an XML processing language (i.e. pipelines).

AFAIU the group's direction is not to reinvent something new, but to standardize what already exists, taking as inputs two pipeline languages that were submitted as W3C notes, namely Norman Walsh's[2] and XPL from Orbeon[3] (that BTW they claim to be the pipeline language "that has in fact been used the most"[4].

My impression is that what this WG will end up defining yet another programming language in XML, and that this language will either be very limited in the processing types it allows in order to be implemented on a wide range of platforms (including browsers), or allow a lot of extensibility, thus actually limiting its portability.

WDYT, should we join the party?

Sylvain

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Processing/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-xml-pipeline-20020228/
[3] http://www.w3.org/Submission/xpl/
[4] http://www.orbeon.com/blog/2005/12/20/xml-processing-model-working-group-meetings-have-started/

--
Sylvain Wallez                        Anyware Technologies
http://bluxte.net                     http://www.anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member     Research & Technology Director

Reply via email to