Reinhard Poetz schrieb: > <hat type="neutral" mode="on"> > Since the GT in Amsterdam, when Daniel used "Cocoon 3.0" for his proposal of > an > OSGi based Cocoon, we have been talking about Cocoon 3.0 in different ways. > For > example in the meantime Sylvain used "Cocoon 3.0" as the subject of the > discussion that he started in December. > > While working with Daniel in April we used "Cocoon 3.0" as a name for our > vision of an OSGi-based Cocoon. The point is that the vision has become > reality > in the meantime[1] and the number of open tasks (see JIRA > http://tinyurl.com/rubss) is manageable. > > What I want is that we agree on a name for OSGi based Cocoon within the > Cocoon community, either "Cocoon 3.0" or a code name. We also have to take > into > account that trunk might also be released as Cocoon 2.3. > > WDOT, should we use "Cocoon 3.0" for OSGi based Cocoon or find a code name and > tag it with a release number when we are close to our first milestone/alpha > release? > </hat> > I don't know if "3.0" is a good "name" or not, but I would really appreciate it if we try to release a 2.2/2.3 before a 3.0!
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
