Ralph Goers wrote: > The folks who are decided to maintain their blocks this way did it with > the clear understanding that this was the price they would have to pay, > so I don't think the clarification is necessary. I can recall at least > one instance where a change to one of these blocks had to be backed or > modified because it broke the 2.1.x branch. Remember, we voted a while > ago for trunk to only support 1.4 and up while 2.1.x supports 1.3, so > this problem already exists. > Yepp, and I think as soon as we have 2.2 out, we should not share these blocks with 2.1.x anymore as all new features should go to 2.2 only. 2.1.x is then a real maintenance branch where we only do minor improvements and bugfixing.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
