On 8/11/06, Jorg Heymans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

>>> -0, because this means eliminating cocoon 2.2 on "older" application
>>> servers eg weblogic 8.1.
> IIUC weblogic 8.1 uses servlet 2.3 so I guess you need to veto the use
> of servlet 2.4 to make this a valid point.
>

I felt that my current involvement in cocoon is not big enough to
warrant a veto, hence the -0 here. WLS 8.1 was just an example from my
past experience, but technically you're right ofcourse.

Based on the "Voting Policies" thread I think it's legitimate for me
to ask if you can give us a _compelling_ reason why you need to run
Cocoon 2.2 on a platform that does not have Java 5 support and why
running Cocoon 2.1 instead isn't sufficient?  If you have a real use
case that requires Cocoon 2.2 on some platform that does not support
Java 5 then I think a veto would be appropriate. Otherwise, I think a
-0 would be a good indication of concern.

--
Peter Hunsberger

Reply via email to