Just to clarify... I had a typo/braino:
On Dec 18, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Mark Lundquist wrote:
If users *do* give a rip, then the answer might *still* be "too freakin' bad!" What else? "Bummer about Cocoon, they could never release 2.1.11 because they couldn't do it without 'changing the contracts' and there were no resources to do the work to make it 1.3-compatible"?
I meant "2.1.10", not "2.1.11"!! cheers, —ml—
