Alfred Nathaniel wrote: > I agree, too. > > The last thing I want is to hold up the 2.1.10. If I had known what I > stirred up here, I would not have started it. I guess most of us did not expect this :(
> > I apologize for the short time for discusion and vote but the idea was > to get it into 2.1.10. Otherwise it will stay forever. The intension was definitly good. > > Personally I think trunk is still too immature and unapproachable that > there must a way open for 2.1.11+ release. Don't know if trunk is really immature, but looking at the past it seems unlikely that we will release 2.2 in a short timeframe; so it is realistic that we will have a 2.1.11. > I am not so firm in ASF rules. Does the one who called the vote have > the right to withdraw the motion? Or does somebody else want to call a > vote to undo this vote? I think you can just withdraw the vote (if you would have a vote to undo a vote, someone could vote there -1 ... would be funny somehow) The remaining question is, if we want to keep the notice in the status.xml for 2.1.10? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
