Sorry, I hit the wrong button, so former reply doesn't has any changes :-( > I haven't tested your changes but I would like to something more general. > > I wonder if you have not hurried up too much with this change. Even > though Xinha is an obvious replacement for HTMLArea they are _not_ the > same projects. I think that if someone wants to switch to a new > project she should give others a few days for comments, raising > concerns etc. Of course, I think that formal vote would be overkill in > this case. > > It's especially valid in this case because Rice proposed to use Dojo's > editor as an alternative. I was going to raise the same issue but > wanted to do some research before so I could add some value to the > discussion. Unfortunately, I have not had enough time to do it. > > Felix, all in all, I'm not against this particular change and speaking > honestly I _am_ happy that we finally moved to Xinha but I couldn't > resist commenting general practise.
Well, that's what I'm of course lacking as newbie , the general practise. I just had some time left last weekend and that was the result. It's not in fact a replacement, you should be able to use it in parallel. Don't hesitate to open the discussion you had in mind. I can undo my changes if this hinders a discussion about it. Anyway I think the discussion should be raised and from my POV it's not bad to give a user different implementations of editors he can use. I agree that the title of the issues I raised/fixed/closed may be not absolutely correct, because I didn't replaced it. So let's raise the discussion about (another or the) replacement for HTMLArea. Felix
