[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573565#comment-13573565
]
Francesco Chicchiriccò commented on COCOON-2330:
------------------------------------------------
Not completely: I still believe we need to separate LICENSEs and NOTICEs.
I'd change your latest proposal as:
* use current LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt for src package
* create legal-deps/LICENSE.txt and legal-deps/NOTICE.txt being the merge of
all legal/*.license.txt under the following conditions:
1. do not repeat the same license more than once: if the EPL license is
already there for dependency X, just say "dependency Y released under EPL, see
above"
2. split the content of current legal/$1.txt between LICENSE and NOTICE; for
example the content of 'jfor-0.7.1.jar.license.txt' will become
NOTICE.txt
"""
This product includes software developed by the jfor project.
Copyright (c) 2002 by the jfor project. All rights reserved.
"""
LICENSE.txt
"""
(the rest of jfor-0.7.1.jar.license.txt's content)
"""
...and finally remove the whole legal subdir.
WDYT?
> Release separate source and dependencies packages
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COCOON-2330
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2330
> Project: Cocoon
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: - Build System: Ant
> Affects Versions: 2.1.11
> Reporter: Francesco Chicchiriccò
> Fix For: 2.1.12
>
>
> As recently reported by David Corssley [1] the 2.1.X release must comply with
> ASF policies about releases, in particular providing a separate source code
> package (without any external JAR file inside) and dependencies package (with
> all external JAR files) for distribution.
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/f6rm2ca35eiraf7i
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
