On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 18/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > >>> > >>> Changes since the last try: > >>> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct > >>> place in all distributables > >>> - A couple of minor bugs were fixed > >>> > >>> Release Notes: > >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160 > >>> > >>> Tag: > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/ > > > > I think Rahul has mentioned this: > > > > What happened to issue-tracking.xml ? > > Should issue-tracking.xml.bak be there? > > This was a deliberate file rename on my part, see r595118. Because of > the way the file is named no html page will be rendered for it. It will > be reinstated later on.
OK. > > Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution zip: > > > > xdocs/** > > build-testing.xml > > commons-logging-api.pom > > doap_logging.rdf > > PROPOSAL.html > > STATUS.html > > > > Surely at least some of these belong in the distribution? > > The I started preparing the Maven 2 assembly for logging I posted a > discussion thread called "What's in a distribution". Consensus was not > reached, but I did my best at creating something that would satisfy most > people. > > xdocs/** - isn't needed, because the entire generated site is included > in the distro > build-testing.xml - this one should really be in there (was added after > I had created the assembly). Good catch! I just used WinMerge to compare the tagged files with those in the distribution. > commons-logging-api.pom - This was a temporary fix that was created to > remedy the fact that the automatically (M1 to M2) converted pom in 1.1 > was a disaster when it came to dependencies. Can probably be deleted > from svn now, but shouldn't be in the distro anyway. > > As for the rest - I don't know and I don't care. > > Until we have reached consensus about what files should be in a > distribution, I think that it is up to the Release Manager to decide > what goes in there. OK. My view is that the source distribution should contain everything that is in SVN. > > > >>> Staged repository: > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-commons-logging/ > >> Not sure why there are MD5 and SHA1 checksums of the .ASC files - > >> surely they are redundant? > >> > >> Also, it would be nice if the MD5 files had the file name in them. > >> > >>> Distribution files: > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip.asc > >> No MD5 or SHA1 files at all here - there should be at least one or the > >> other for the zip and .tar.gz files > >> > >>> Please cast your votes! > >>> > >>> [ ] +1, Let's do it > >>> [ ] -1, Nah > >>> > >>> > >>> Here's my +1 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Dennis Lundberg > >>> > > -- > Dennis Lundberg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
