Dennis Lundberg wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
Changes since the last try:
- The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the
correct
place in all distributables
- A couple of minor bugs were fixed
Release Notes:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/
I think Rahul has mentioned this:
What happened to issue-tracking.xml ?
Should issue-tracking.xml.bak be there?
This was a deliberate file rename on my part, see r595118. Because of
the way the file is named no html page will be rendered for it. It will
be reinstated later on.
Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution zip:
xdocs/**
build-testing.xml
commons-logging-api.pom
doap_logging.rdf
PROPOSAL.html
STATUS.html
Surely at least some of these belong in the distribution?
The I started preparing the Maven 2 assembly for logging I posted a
discussion thread called "What's in a distribution". Consensus was not
reached, but I did my best at creating something that would satisfy most
people.
xdocs/** - isn't needed, because the entire generated site is included
in the distro
build-testing.xml - this one should really be in there (was added after
I had created the assembly). Good catch!
I have added this to the assembly.
commons-logging-api.pom - This was a temporary fix that was created to
remedy the fact that the automatically (M1 to M2) converted pom in 1.1
was a disaster when it came to dependencies. Can probably be deleted
from svn now, but shouldn't be in the distro anyway.
As for the rest - I don't know and I don't care.
Until we have reached consensus about what files should be in a
distribution, I think that it is up to the Release Manager to decide
what goes in there.
Staged repository:
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-commons-logging/
Not sure why there are MD5 and SHA1 checksums of the .ASC files -
surely they are redundant?
Also, it would be nice if the MD5 files had the file name in them.
Distribution files:
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip
http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip.asc
No MD5 or SHA1 files at all here - there should be at least one or the
other for the zip and .tar.gz files
Please cast your votes!
[ ] +1, Let's do it
[ ] -1, Nah
Here's my +1
--
Dennis Lundberg
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
