On 19/03/2008, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/19/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Specifically for James Carman - how does Dave's patch to your > > COLLECTIONS-194 look? > > I would rather see it with the nopTransformer(), personally. This > would remove the null checks from the implementation method (the one > that takes all of the parameters). I actually had this code lying > around and I don't know why I didn't do the work to patch it myself. > I have updated the patch to include James's suggested improvements.
Cheers, Dave
