On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Dan Fabulich <[email protected]> wrote: > "NEEDS" is a little strong.... I think there's room in the world for a > backwards-compatible dbutils 1.3 with generics and varargs followed shortly > afterward by a more thoroughly re-worked dbutils 2.0.
That sounds like a good approach. Don't leave too many folks out in the cold. Good thinking! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
