+1 on all of that cheers -- Torsten
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 17:23, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27/04/2009, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> we have fixed all bugs we mentioned for 1.0 release. The API looks >> quite good for my eyes (even when Sebastian finds some stuff here and >> there :-)) and I would like to think about a release again. Is there >> anything speaking against this step? Anything we really need to do >> before discussing about a release? > > I think the API is now much better. > > The only minor issue I have is with finish() and close(). > I think it is going to be annoying for users to have to call finish() > separately from close(). > > I would prefer to see finish() being optional, i.e. close() should > call it if necessary. > > But the code should check to make sure that finish() is not called > twice, and maybe should check that only close() - and write() - is > allowed after calling finish(). > >> Best, >> Christian >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
