> The only minor issue I have is with finish() and close(). > I think it is going to be annoying for users to have to call finish() > separately from close(). > > I would prefer to see finish() being optional, i.e. close() should > call it if necessary. > > But the code should check to make sure that finish() is not called > twice, and maybe should check that only close() - and write() - is > allowed after calling finish().
sounds good! +1 from my side too --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
