On 12/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>  > Yes, I know; the original instructions (shown as outdated, at the
>  >>  > bottom) imply that it is possible; seems to me it would be a lot
>  >>  > better.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> No its not outdated - just the last paragraph is outdated by the above 
> writings:
>  >
>  > That's what I meant - the last para is marked as outdated.
>
>
> ah forgive, I should read better.... yes you are right. sorry.
>
>
>  >>  I don't know where the problem is, but according to Jörgs e-mail I
>  >>  would say we can ignore for now. Just saw your PM with the properties,
>  >>  I guess there is no need to answer any more
>  >
>  > No, but if you could apply the property changes that would be good -
>  > or let me know and I can check out the code on people.a.o and do it
>  > there.
>
>
> Wouldn't it be better to do this at trunk? Didn't Jörg say this isn't 
> necessary?
>  When doing a new RC i check out the trunk again new and fresh. I think
>  it would be better to have changes there instead of patching the RC?
>  Or did I miss something, sorry for aksing dumb.
>

Sorry, that's what I meant - fix the files in SVN trunk, and they will
be included in any new tags.

>  Cheers
>  Christian
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to