On 31/05/2009, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1. > > > > Changes in RC2 > > > > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt > > * Restored development reports > > * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests - > > thanks, sebb! > > > Unfortunately not enough, see below... > > > > * Added link to release javadoc in site.xml > > * Fixed xml errors in changes.xml > > * Added test for ErodingPerKeyKeyedObjectPool > > * Changed clirr comparison version from 1.3 to 1.4 > > * Added missing attributes to sources jar manifest > > > > The files are here: > > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-pool-1.5-RC2/ > > > Source and binary archives agree with each other; hashes and sigs OK. > > Unfortunately, I got a new test failure with Java 1.4.2 and Maven: > > testEvictorVisiting(org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool) > Time elapsed: 0.063 sec <<< FAILURE! > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError > at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47) > at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20) > at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:27) > at > org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.checkEvictorVisiting(TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.java:947) > at > org.apache.commons.pool.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.testEvictorVisiting(TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.java:810) > > I tried re-running the test, and it was OK. Tried rebuild and retest - OK. > > As far as I can tell, that particular test does not use threads or > timers as part of the test case, so that suggests that there might be > a timing/threading issue in the main pool code. > > I'll try re-running the test case a few more times to see if I can get > it to go wrong again.
It failed again after a further 70 or so runs, so if it is a timing issue, the window must be very small. > Also, clearly the failure message needs to be enhanced to show which > of the following checks failed: > > assertTrue(visitCount >= cycleCount && > visitCount <= cycleCount + 1); > > Unfortunately a lot of the assertions fail to provide any details of > what has gone wrong, which make debugging a lot harder. I'm just working through the Test class now, adding messages where the values are not obvious from the context. > == > > Not sure if this is a problem, but the RELEASE-NOTES etc refer to 1.5-RC2. > > The OSGI versions likewise include the RC2. > > Does that mean there will need to be another build and vote before release? > > > > The tag is here: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_RC2/ > > > I used "Last Changed Rev: 780316" > > The differences between the xml files have now disappeared; not sure > what went wrong before. > > Also the only difference between the tag and the source archives are > doap and release notes, as expected. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Phil > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
