On 27/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > Hi. > > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded > on April 1, concerning this issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361 > > Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"? >
Apache does have a concept of lazy consensus, but that applies to votes, and the vote e-mail will say that it is using lazy consensus. I don't think it normally applies to JIRA issues. > Someone had suggested creating a branch. That would be a way to set up a > fully working demo of the proposed changes. It will be much easier to understand the changes if they are presented as code. It would also be possible to set up a sandbox project containing a few example classes from the Math codebase. That might be easier to comprehend as it would be a lot smaller. By the way, there are no AL headers in the code. These need to be added. Also, the Cal10nAdapter class is in a strange package - why not put it in a commons package? > I would also need someone knowledgeable in Maven to perform modifications > that would allow the creation of multiple JARs, and set a dependency to the > "CAL10N" library. [A compile-time dependency for Commons-Math itself, and a > runtime dependency for the code that will be a bridge to the "CAL10N" > external library.] Not sure why you need multiple jars. > > Best regards, > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org