> > I don't understand. What more will you have with a copy there of only the > > files that are already available on JIRA? > > Being able to build it with IDEs and run tests using IDEs or Maven. > Easier to collaborate on changes.
But you'll be able to do that with the whole thing too. The alternative means that I have to select by hand which files to copy and check that the selection is self-consistent. Whereas I thought to start from a clean slate and make the minimum changes to show how it would work. I stress again that, doing this, I intended to assume that a dependency to "CAL10N" is acceptable. Do we have to vote first? > > I thought I should start making the modifications, so that there would a > > working version of CM using the "CAL10N" library. > > The problem with a full branch is that merging changes back can be > very tedious and easy to make errors. > > It would be a lot easier to make the changes directly in trunk, once > the principle has been agreed on. I certainly agree. Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
