On 29/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't understand. What more will you have with a copy there of only the > > > files that are already available on JIRA? > > > > Being able to build it with IDEs and run tests using IDEs or Maven. > > Easier to collaborate on changes. > > > But you'll be able to do that with the whole thing too.
But it's harder to see the detail if there are lots of classes present. > The alternative means that I have to select by hand which files to copy and > check that the selection is self-consistent. I think you only need to copy one or two classes to show the principle. Try it and see. > Whereas I thought to start from > a clean slate and make the minimum changes to show how it would work. > I stress again that, doing this, I intended to assume that a dependency to > "CAL10N" is acceptable. Do we have to vote first? > > > > I thought I should start making the modifications, so that there would a > > > working version of CM using the "CAL10N" library. > > > > The problem with a full branch is that merging changes back can be > > very tedious and easy to make errors. > > > > It would be a lot easier to make the changes directly in trunk, once > > the principle has been agreed on. > > > I certainly agree. > > > > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
