On 31 August 2010 17:02, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 August 2010 14:39, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Rahul, >> I just added the xdoc version of the documentation present in the >> package.html files. > > The package.html files are normally used to annotate the Javadoc output. > > However in this case these files have got a lot more content than is > normally present in the Javadoc. > >> Do you think these last can be removed, since >> would be redundant with the new developers guide? > > There should at least be minimal package.html files for Javadoc usage, > so I don't think the files should be removed entirely, but they could > be replaced with much simpler versions. > >> At this stage, we >> should maintain two different data sources with same information, I'd >> propose to drop the existing one, but let choose together. >> Another small question: in src/conf there is a MANIFEST.MF[1] file >> that contains informations that maven can generate automatically, do >> you think we can drop it, when dropping the ant build? > > +1 to dropping MANIFEST.MF. > >> Thanks in advance, have a nice day! >> Simo >> >> [1] >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF >>
Forgot to add - could update JUnit to the latest 4.x release, i.e. 4.8.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
