On 31 August 2010 19:29, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Seb, > thanks for your feedbacks, always appreciated! I know and understand > the need of having the package.html files, but what do you think about > replacing them with the package-info.java files? It should be the > same, or not? I've been working with them and found it very > comfortables.
Never used them, so I don't know. Do they cause any problems with IDEs or Maven? They are .java files - so do they end up as .class files? > I'll start staking care of migrating the JUnit dependency, is it fine > for you just adding the @Test annotation on existing methods, without > renaming them? The number of tests is quite large... :P I would not bother with converting the existing tests. > Thanks in advance, have a nice day, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:09 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 31 August 2010 17:02, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 31 August 2010 14:39, Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Rahul, >>>> I just added the xdoc version of the documentation present in the >>>> package.html files. >>> >>> The package.html files are normally used to annotate the Javadoc output. >>> >>> However in this case these files have got a lot more content than is >>> normally present in the Javadoc. >>> >>>> Do you think these last can be removed, since >>>> would be redundant with the new developers guide? >>> >>> There should at least be minimal package.html files for Javadoc usage, >>> so I don't think the files should be removed entirely, but they could >>> be replaced with much simpler versions. >>> >>>> At this stage, we >>>> should maintain two different data sources with same information, I'd >>>> propose to drop the existing one, but let choose together. >>>> Another small question: in src/conf there is a MANIFEST.MF[1] file >>>> that contains informations that maven can generate automatically, do >>>> you think we can drop it, when dropping the ant build? >>> >>> +1 to dropping MANIFEST.MF. >>> >>>> Thanks in advance, have a nice day! >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF >>>> >> >> Forgot to add - could update JUnit to the latest 4.x release, i.e. 4.8.1 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
