On Nov 4, 2010, at 8:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/4/10 9:42 AM, Brian Fox wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:25 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 3 November 2010 23:22, Ralph Goers<ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >>>> This is a vote to release Apache Commons VFS 2.0. >>> -1 There does not appear to be a tar.gz version of >>> commons-vfs-project-2.0-source-release.zip >> >> The source archives should be taken care of by the standard >> apache-release profile defined in the Apache pom. This is what we put >> together to make it possible for all maven projects at apache to >> easily meet the source archive standards. We currently do not produce >> tar.gz archives of the sources, just zips. I don't think both are >> required since it's a waste of storage and tar.gz is usually needed >> when you have to preserve binary permissions. We're talking about >> sources here so a zip should be sufficient. > > We need both zips and tars of the sources for the actual release (what we > push to dist/). > > Phil
Brian wants to know why. It certainly isn't mandated by the board. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
