On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would not -1 the release, but I would encourage the RM to consider making > it 1.x if there are no compat breaks. >
So, how about now that we know there are compat breaks? I would -1 the release now that we know the API is in fact "broken" between 1 and 2 and they're not doing the package/artifactId change (barring any justification why we think it's okay). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
