On Nov 7, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 11/7/10 8:19 PM, James Carman wrote: >> So you think that if there is no API break, then you don't bump major >> version numbers? So what about vfs 2.0? Would you vote against it? > > I would not -1 the release, but I would encourage the RM to consider making > it 1.x if there are no compat breaks. >
As Sebb has shown there are compatibility breaks. The real issue here is that it has been far too long since a VFS release has been done. I'm not sure why the version was bumped from 1.1 to 2.0, but it happened in March 2008, at least 8 months before I started working on the code. That change was 16 months after the prior release. Is the goal to never do a release? Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
