> >> > - * @deprecated in 2.2 (to be removed in 3.0). Please use
> >> > - * {...@link #map(UnivariateRealFunction)} directly with
> >> > - * the function classes in package
> >> > - * {...@link org.apache.commons.math.analysis.function}.
> >> > + * @deprecated in 2.2 (to be removed in 3.0).
> >>
> >> Why not leave the reference to #map(UnivariateRealFunction) ?
> >
> > Because the package "function" does not exist in MATH_2_X.
>
> I know that, but #map(UnivariateRealFunction) does exist (in the same
> source file).
>
> It was only the reference to the package name that was wrong.
>
> If the replacement for the deprecated methods is not
> #map(UnivariateRealFunction), then whatever is the replacement should
> be specified in the Javadoc.
The replacement is the method "map" (which exists) together with the
appropriate function (which doesn't, unless someone wants to backport the
"function" package).
I think that we agreed with Phil that when the replacement doesn't exist, it
is sufficient to warn the users with a terse deprecation message.
Regards,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
