So we should relaunch a vote? (or... I should vote a no and relaunch?) paul
Le 16 mai 2011 à 23:44, Phil Steitz a écrit : >>> d) svn remains open (but no commits without revival vote) >> It seems slightly too harsh to me. >> Since jelly is among the heaviest targeted ones here, I think the whole >> dormancy aspect would fit but preventing commits sounds like the best way to >> "cap off any attempt of revival". >> Couldn't we say >> > Good point. I would be OK with that change. > > Phil >>> d) svn remains open (but no release without revival vote) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
