On 5/16/11 2:57 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > So we should relaunch a vote? > (or... I should vote a no and relaunch?)
Lets see how others respond. There may be other changes... Phil > paul > > > Le 16 mai 2011 à 23:44, Phil Steitz a écrit : > >>>> d) svn remains open (but no commits without revival vote) >>> It seems slightly too harsh to me. >>> Since jelly is among the heaviest targeted ones here, I think the whole >>> dormancy aspect would fit but preventing commits sounds like the best way >>> to "cap off any attempt of revival". >>> Couldn't we say >>> >> Good point. I would be OK with that change. >> >> Phil >>>> d) svn remains open (but no release without revival vote) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
