Dormant should be read only. I say move it.
On Jun 10, 2011 8:07 AM, "Konstantin Kolinko" <knst.koli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2011/6/10 Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>:
>> In order to avoid any damage... :)
>> Can someone confirm that the following command
>>
>> `svn move https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/graph2/
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/ -m "commons-graph
>> resurrected after vote passed
>> http://markmail.org/message/mlvqiqhqm2nqhofr"`
>
> I think it is
> svn move https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/graph2
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/graph2
>
> For reference --- I recently used similar command -- you may see "svn
> copy" in my proposal for BZ 51249 in Tomcat 6.0 STATUS file [1] There
> I create a copy of a new folder that contains test files. I had to
> specify source and target names.
>
> [1]: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
>
> By the way
> 1. You may go with "svn copy" and
> delete old folder with "svn del" afterwards as a separate command if
> everything is OK with the copy.
>
> 2. Do you really need to mv it to sandbox? There were some voices to
> continue development in dormant until the component is ready for a
> release.
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
