Thanks Gary. So 4 +1s.
Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)? Hen On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my > -1 :) > > Gary > > >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you >>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit >>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in >>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release. >>> >>> Hen >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is >>> a >>> > known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like >>> we >>> > are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation >>> is >>> > painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using >>> > custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason >>> IMO >>> > to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not >>> want >>> > to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully >>> baked, >>> > especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but >>> I do >>> > not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for >>> 3.0. >>> > It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and >>> > testing. >>> > >>> > Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to >>> go >>> > with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full >>> POV. >>> > >>> > Thank you for reading and talking :) >>> > >>> > Gary >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720. >>> >> >>> >> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :) >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com >>> > >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > -1, let's pick up the committed fix for >>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720 >>> >> > >>> >> > I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense >>> to >>> >> > polish this new code as much as possible IMO. >>> >> > >>> >> > Gary >>> >> > >>> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> RC4 is available here: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/ >>> >> >> >>> >> >> SVN: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/ >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Maven artifacts: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/ >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Website: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/ >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may >>> prove >>> >> >> useful: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html >>> >> >> >>> >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 >>> July >>> >> >> 2011. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ================ >>> >> >> [ ] +1 >>> >> >> [ ] -1, with reason >>> >> >> ================ >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Hen >>> >> >> >>> >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 >>> >> >> effort* >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Thank you, >>> >> > Gary >>> >> > >>> >> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>> >> > http://garygregory.com/ >>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>> >> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thank you, >>> > Gary >>> > >>> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>> > http://garygregory.com/ >>> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thank you, >> Gary >> >> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >> http://garygregory.com/ >> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > > > -- > Thank you, > Gary > > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ > http://garygregory.com/ > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
