Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt releasing 3.0.
Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with something like that is something the build system needs to know how to do. Hen On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: > StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its > been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for > testing) > > Stephen > > On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: >> >>> I'm willing to vote +1 >>> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent >>> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved. >>> >>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an >>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant >> builds before my commit. >> >> Gary >> >>> >>> Stephen >>> >>> >>> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Thanks Gary. >>>> >>>> So 4 +1s. >>>> >>>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting >>>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)? >>>> >>>> Hen >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove >>>>> my >>>>> -1 :) >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell >>>>>> <flame...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you >>>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit >>>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in >>>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like >>>>>>> we >>>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary >>>>>>>> using >>>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good >>>>>>>> reason >>>>>>> IMO >>>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not >>>>>>> want >>>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully >>>>>>> baked, >>>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but >>>>>>> I do >>>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for >>>>>>> 3.0. >>>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and >>>>>>>> testing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to >>>>>>> go >>>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full >>>>>>> POV. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gary >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on >>>>>>>>> LANG-720. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gary >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> SVN: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Website: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may >>>>>>> prove >>>>>>>>>>> useful: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 >>>>>>> July >>>>>>>>>>> 2011. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ================ >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, with reason >>>>>>>>>>> ================ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hen >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 >>>>>>>>>>> effort* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>>> Gary >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>> Gary >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>> Gary >>>>>> >>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>>>>> http://garygregory.com/ >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ >>>>> http://garygregory.com/ >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ >>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
