I'm afraid I don't understand what you are proposing. Ralph
On Jul 26, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Ralph, > > Ralph Goers wrote: > >> For some reason Christian's message didn't arrive in the proper email >> folder so I never saw it. >> >> Actually, the real problem here isn't as much the LICENSE and NOTICE files >> as it is checkstyle.xml. It would be bad to have copy of that file in >> each sub-folder as the checkstyle rules would be likely to get out of >> synch. However, it is probably good to have a single copy of the other >> files as well. > > For the generated Eclipse project it is the additional resource (and > testResource) definition of those two files in the commons-parent. It will > *always* create a non-usable Eclipse project. Therefore I wonder if we can > take the same approach for the main and test artifact as we do for the > javadoc - simply by using the antrun plugin instead. This would prevent the > addition of the basedir to the classpath. > > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
