2011/8/11 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > 2011/8/11 Sébastien Brisard <sebastien.bris...@m4x.org>: >> OK, this I also think would be useful. But my initial question >> remains, if the object I want to protect is not a RealVector, what do >> you think of my solution ? >> Sébastien > > If you create the read-only version by subclassing the writable > version, then you have to ensure that all mutating methods are > overridden. > If a base class is later extended to add a new mutator, the protection is > lost. That's quite true... Didn't think of that. It pretty much ruins it, doesn't it?
Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
