> > +1 to add both of these, though I would suggest one of the following > pairs of names: > 0) negate, invert > 1) opposite, reciprocal > 2) additiveInverse, multiplicativeInverse > > Probably 2) is clearest, but a bit long. I am fine with any of them. > > Phil > I do think these two features might prove useful. There are workarounds, but they tend to verbose code. As for the options you suggest, Phil, I agree my proposition was probably not the best. We must be careful with consistency, because some classes already implement those methods (Complex has a method negate()). I will look into it, and open a JIRA ticket.
Sébastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
