> > +1 to add both of these, though I would suggest one of the following > pairs of names: > 0) negate, invert > 1) opposite, reciprocal > 2) additiveInverse, multiplicativeInverse > > Probably 2) is clearest, but a bit long. I am fine with any of them. > > Phil > Hi, I've created MATH-686 which relates to this proposal. However looking at what's already implemented in the CM library, I found that the best (unsatisfactory) option would be negate()/reciprocal() -- see the ticket. Native english speakers will probably not like that! Are we really that unhappy with this? Sébastien
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
