On 2011-10-26, Gary Gregory wrote: > in trunk now, the following have 0% code coverage according to > Cobertura:
> - Lister really only a demo-class. > - DumpArchiveConstants: How can it have 0% when it is used? Does Cobertura > know how to deal with enums? It outer class doesn't have any methods, the inner classes are reported separately - and it is quite possible the untested code actually doesn't get used at all (the find methods seem to be unused). > - ZipConstants: Same oddity as above? No methods at all, only a private constructor to prevent instantiation of the utility class. > The trunk POM uses cobertura-maven-plugin 2.2 (= Cobertura 1.9) and not the > latest 2.5.1 (= Cobertura 1.9.4.1). > With the latest plugin, the number are a little worse overall and for some > classes a little better. The report is more detailed with other classes, > with some annon inner classes (...$1) added for example. > I've updated the POM in SVN trunk. +1, thank you. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
