I have a preference fo juli. IIRC, Tomcat has a bridge from juli to logging impl, it would help to keep [pool] dependencies-less.
-Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > One of the big design decisions left for pool2 is whether or not to add > logging. If logging is added then that opens up the what to log and with > which logging framework questions. > > I do think some form of logging is required. > > See POOL-131 for one example of where logging could be useful. > > I have a preference for commons-logging. Partly since it is eating our > own dog food, partly because it will make updating Tomcat to use pool2 > easier. > > I did have a random thought that we could do zero logging but emit JMX > notifications if JMX was enabled. It avoids the "which framework" debate > but uses an approach that is far less widely used in my experience. > > All this is because I am (hopefully) getting close to the point where > the pool2 code is ready for an alpha release. > > Thoughts? > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
