On Feb 10, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 10/02/2012 16:22, Gary Gregory a écrit : > >> This would be good to know: What is the performance hit of the two >> solutions above? >> >> The question becomes: should pool2 depend on CL? > > Bridging JUL is probably not the most efficient solution, but if the > application is not very log intensive I think it's ok. > > For [pool2] I suggest using JUL.
Sorry, I suggest never using JUL unless it is a standalone app. Never use it in a library. Many people bridge the APIs and JUL is very inefficient to do. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
