> * Why doesn't "KolmogorovSmirnovDistribution" implement one of the
> interfaces of the package (and/or inherit from an abstract class)?
See also:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/math-KolmogorovSmirnovDistribution-not-part-of-the-distribution-hierarchy-td4114395.html
> * Why is method "probability(double)" part of the "RealDistribution"
> interface? [All implementations return 0.]
My guess would be that it is left over from when integer and real
distributions shared a common hierarchy.
Dennis
On 07/31/2012 01:41 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hello.
Some questions about classes in package "o.a.c.m.distribution".
* Why doesn't "KolmogorovSmirnovDistribution" implement one of the
interfaces of the package (and/or inherit from an abstract class)?
* Why is method "probability(double)" part of the "RealDistribution"
interface? [All implementations return 0.]
* Shouldn't the "cumulativeProbability(double x0, double x1)" method be
renamed "probability(double x0, double x1)"?
Regards,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
