Gary Gregory wrote: > I say +1 > > BUT... > In the MANIFEST.MF, these look good: > > Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > Bundle-SymbolicName: org.apache.commons.logging > Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > Bundle-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > BUT I'd like to see "Apache" added to: > > Implementation-Title: Commons Logging > Specification-Title: Commons Logging > Bundle-Name: Commons Logging > Bundle-Description: Commons Logging is a thin adapter allowing configu > rable bridging to other, well known logging systems. > > So that we have: > > Implementation-Title: *Apache *Commons Logging > Specification-Title: *Apache *Commons Logging > Bundle-Name: *Apache *Commons Logging > Bundle-Description: *Apache *Commons Logging is a thin adapter allowing > configu > rable bridging to other, well known logging systems.
This is the case for the Manifests in all releases of the other components, too. And we use the name in the project summary of each component also without the "Apache": http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/project-summary.html - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
