On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote: > > > I say +1 > > > > BUT... > > In the MANIFEST.MF, these look good: > > > > Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > > Bundle-SymbolicName: org.apache.commons.logging > > Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > Bundle-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > > > BUT I'd like to see "Apache" added to: > > > > Implementation-Title: Commons Logging > > Specification-Title: Commons Logging > > Bundle-Name: Commons Logging > > Bundle-Description: Commons Logging is a thin adapter allowing configu > > rable bridging to other, well known logging systems. > > > > So that we have: > > > > Implementation-Title: *Apache *Commons Logging > > Specification-Title: *Apache *Commons Logging > > Bundle-Name: *Apache *Commons Logging > > Bundle-Description: *Apache *Commons Logging is a thin adapter allowing > > configu > > rable bridging to other, well known logging systems. > > This is the case for the Manifests in all releases of the other components, > too. And we use the name in the project summary of each component also > without the "Apache": > http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/project-summary.html > It should be fixed there too then. This is not a show-stopper, just an inconsistency in naming. Gary > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
