I am certainly intending to do work on BeanShell. The author(s) have contributed to the various Incubator discussions.
On 29 May 2013 11:59, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, but who will maintain it? What does the author think of this? > > Gary > > On May 29, 2013, at 4:35, Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net> wrote: > >> Being a happy user of BeanShell (in the jEdit world) and being a sleepy >> Apache Commons committer. I'm all in favor of seeing beanshell come in here. >> >> paul >> >> On 28 mai 2013, at 09:34, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> >>> Hi all PMC members, >>> >>> I started a VOTE thread in general@incubator to accept BeanShell in >>> the incubating projects, Bertrand Delacretaz and Ant Elder made >>> interesting observations (pasted below) about accepting BeanShell >>> directly to Commons. >>> >>> I think we are in the similar past situations when we voted new >>> committers and accepted their donations to the Commons Sandbox - WDYT? >>> Would it be reasonable for that PMC accepting BS in Sandbox and accept >>> a couple of new committers? >>> >>> Many thanks in advance, all the best! >>> -Simo >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> >>> Date: Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:37 AM >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator >>> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:07 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> ...Half the committers are ASF >>>> members so they know what they're doing already, we're not going to teach >>>> Sebb anything new about doing releases... >>> >>> Indeed ;-) >>> >>>> ...All thats needed is a software grant and IP clearance (which from the >>>> previous discuss thread has already been done?) and start up right away in >>>> Commons... >>> >>> Makes sense, I agree with you that the Incubator doesn't bring any >>> more value in this case...has the commons PMC been asked about this >>> option? >>> >>> I'm changing my vote to -1, at least until this is clarified. >>> >>> -Bertrand >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
