+1 from me for anything that makes the release process sane. I'd be committing again if preparing a release was simple enough. As it is, I don't have the blocks of time needed to push out a release and committing to projects with no apparent release manager becomes an exercise in futility.
Hen On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:24 AM, James Carman <[email protected]>wrote: > Why don't we create a real project that we can cut real releases on to > test our release procedures? Perhaps we can set it up so that it > doesn't sync with central and just gets staged locally. This way, we > can test out changes to the release process and see how they work. > Also, a new release manager can play around with that project and get > it right before diving into the real work. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
