So did any committer want to exercise a veto? Otherwise the matter is settled right? On Oct 16, 2013 6:38 PM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 October 2013 02:10, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Oct 16, 2013, at 2:46 PM, James Ring wrote: > > > >> Do Apache by-laws require a quorum? Was there a quorum for this vote? > >> > > > > Apache voting rules are documented at > http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html. However, that page doesn't > define "consensus" which is where some of the disagreement came from. > > It's defined in the glossary: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#ConsensusApproval > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
