Hi Oliver, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi Jörg, > > Am 10.01.2014 01:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible: >> Hi Oliver, >> >> Oliver Heger wrote: >> >>> Hi Jörg, >>> >>> thanks for your review. >>> >>> Am 08.01.2014 10:55, schrieb Jörg Schaible: >>>> Hi Oliver, >>>> >>>> README.txt is badly out of date, since it claims we ship >>>> commons-beanutils, commons-beanutils-core and >>>> commons-beanutils-bean-collection. >>> Good spot. I think the file can be removed completely. I will do this in >>> trunk, but I hope there is no need to create another RC. The situation >>> with the collections jars is also explained on the main site. >>> >>> Regarding the failing test cases: Most of them seem to be related to >>> memory leak tests. I guess, here a special strategy is used which may >>> well depend on the JDK. However, the tests affected have not been >>> touched recently - certainly not for the 1.9.1 release and probably not >>> for 1.9.0. So I assume the problems already existed in earlier releases. >> >> I had no time to run my tests for 1.9.0, but there were no errors for >> 1.8.3. Were those tests new? > > No, these tests are not new. And there were no functional changes on > them (they may have been touched for the 1.9.0 release to fix warnings > related to generics). > > Are you sure that they were successful for 1.8.3? I found my VOTE for 1.8.3 in the archives and I am quite sure I ran my standard procedure ;-) The IBM JDKs might have had a lower minor version but existed. Strange, indeed. Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
