On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Le 15/01/2014 14:04, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > > Uh, I want to go the other way around. See my use case. > > Why isn't this suitable to your use case? You could write: > > factory.create(record.toMap()); > > and then remove the create(CSVRecord) method with the duplicated > implementation. > > What am I missing? > That would work. What is still not clean or OO is that toMap() means nothing when no headers are defined. I've split the record into a mapped record subclass here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-104 Thoughts? We can still have toMap() implemented on top of the code now, but it would have to return null if there are no headers. Gary > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
