On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 08:51:32 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 01/05/2015 11:58 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 23:48:43 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Am Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:35:49 +0100
schrieb Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>:
Which docs?
I didn't intend to move the "userguide" document; only the Java
examples currently under "src/userguide/java" would be moved to
"src/main"
I wont mention multiple modules (also this might be a case where it
makes sense, especially if you want to create a dedicated example
jar
file with its own set of dependencies and as it might avoid calling
ant scripts for it), but I would keep the source separated and
rather
add an additional source directory (with the buildhelper).
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>initialize</phase>
<goals><goal>add-source</goal></goals>
<configuration>
<sources>
<source>src/userguide/java</source>
</sources>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
NB: this will produce classes on target/classes so you need to
exclude
them in the JAR.
Thanks.
I find it cleaner to keep the examples separated from the "main"
code;
so if this does the trick, I'd prefer it that way.
We'd nevertheless need that separate JAR that contains the examples,
and a mean to select which of the examples must be run, as proposed
by Sebb.
The examples can not be added to the main code as there is an
additional
dependency (xchart) that we do not want to add to commons-math in
general.
It was never intended to ship the examples as part of the CM
library. [There are provisions in the "pom.xml" to prevent it (IIUC).]
IIUC, Sebb proposed that the source code be moved solely for
the purpose that maven would compile it with the default config.
IIUC, with Bernd's proposal, this move is thus not necessary.
An option would be to add it as part of the test code and use the
"test"
scope for the dependency but for exactly this reason it was decided
to
keep the two things apart (commons-math, userguide).
I have no problem with that, quite the contrary as I write above.
The original issue was: How do we run the examples?
Phil proposed an "ant" script, which I would have happily produced.
But then if "maven" can do it (with the suggested changes to the
"pom.xml"), it's IMO simpler to not have to run a different program.
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
