For such a simple case like logging in a (math) library you can also use the JDK jul logging.
However I really do not see a need for it (and I think it can negatively impact the user experience of a lib if it does logging even when it has no environmental interactions) Am Sat, 26 Sep 2015 01:47:09 +0200 schrieb Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>: > Thanks for the reminder; in that document, we read: > > (1) Scope of the Package > [...] > 5. Limited dependencies. No external dependencies beyond Commons > components and the JDK > > So we are fine if use "Log4j 2" as kindly offered by Gary. > > My long-standing mentioning of slf4j was only because of its > "weightlessness" (thanks to the no-op implementation of its API). > If "Log4j 2" has followed this path, good for everyone. > > No objection, then? Uh, be carefull with the trigger of that gun you point at somenes chest :) Gruss Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
